That's been on my reading list for a while. I'll be on an airplane tomorrow, so I think it'd be a good time to knock that book out.
I've also been told "take what works for you and leave the rest" multiple times. It's hard for me to leave responses from people who indicate they didn't understand what I was saying or what's happening for me, because I feel like often times people will read others' responses and be influenced by their misunderstanding, if that makes sense.
Like-- and this is a vast oversimplification and a fictional example-- if I made a post about my husband needing me to say, walk the dogs while he's away, and that I'm struggling to do it because I sprained my ankle and it's among the things causing conflict in my marriage,
and someone comes along early in the conversation and says something like, "I've sprained my ankle before, and still cared for my cats just fine. I think that you're making excuses because you're harboring resentfulness towards him and don't want to take on the responsibility."
That comment a) misses that I said I have dogs, not cats, and b) that dogs require different care than cats, like being walked, and c) I didn't say I'm struggling to 'care for' them; I said I'm struggling to walk them because I am physically injured.
But others who come along may read that early comment and be influenced by it. They may come to think that I have cats, not dogs, and be primed to interpret everything I say after that as excuse making, especially if they know I'm a WS and hold the bias that all WS attempt to avoid accountability and their part in their relationship dynamics, and then I become the "bad guy" in the scenario. Then they might say things like, "I agree with person A. There's no reason why you can't pour food in a bowl and scoop litter even with a bum ankle. Your husband is away and he needs you to step up. Have you considered how he might be feeling in this situation? Have some empathy. You might have less conflict if you own up to your part in it."
And then I go, "What? That's not what I said; you must have misunderstood. Let me try explaining again. My husband wants me to walk the dogs, not scoop litter. I'm feeding them just fine. Part of our conflict is that I don't feel like he's demonstrating empathy for my injury, or grasping that I physically can't do it, not that I don't want to or that I'm lazy.."
But it's too late, because now multiple people have agreed that I'm just avoiding responsibility for the pets and my role in the conflict, and some of them will probably even call me "defensive" for trying to correct the misunderstanding.
And then I'll be like, "No. I'm not being defensive, and I'm not avoiding accountability. I said I have dogs and a sprained ankle from the beginning, and I physically cannot do what my husband is asking me to do. I understand that our dogs need to be cared for and how he might be feeling, and I want him to feel better so that he can work effectively while he's away. I offered to hire a dog walker, but he wanted me to do it, not spend money to have someone else do it, because he doesn't understand that I can't. That's why I'm saying he's the one not having empathy for me..."
But they'll just double down, instead of acknowledging the misunderstanding and adjusting their response, again, because of the bias, even if you point it out, and then the recap of the entire conversation gets so long and convoluted that they can just denounce you as "crazy" or "exhausting" and they have a convenient out without any resolution. They might even say things like, "This is exhausting; none of that is going on. Everyone here is responding to what you're telling them. They're in agreement and they're kindly trying to help you. You would do well to listen to them. I'm not going to argue with you about it anymore though. Good luck to you."
And then sometimes, that reputation follows you to other posts: now you're not only a person who avoids accountability and lacks empathy, but you're also crazy and exhausting, and that's the preconceived notion that people have of you when they respond going forward.
You can see how that's crazy-making, right?
It makes me feel better to at least point out the dynamics happening and attempt to keep the conversation on track. A part of me hopes that the explanation of them reaches some of the respondents, and maybe they'll self reflect and not do that to other people in their own lives. But most of me knows it's unlikely. I think that it's a useful exercise in exposure therapy either way, and that I'm getting better with not triggering so hard.
I do think my husband is hurting and struggling to self-regulate, whether it's from the infidelity or his own childhood trauma or both or something more. I don't think he's doing this to me on purpose, and that's congruent with him denying it and taking offense when I bring the tactics up. If I felt sure he was doing it intentionally, then I would have a much harder time staying and forgiving him... But still, there's a deep need to protect myself from that kind of abuse, and a little voice whispering, "But what if it is intentional? Are we safe?" And so I have to collect evidence and evaluate the reality of the situation, just in case, at the same time that I'm navigating his emotions.